Chrysler 2000

Chrysler 2000. Chrysler 2000 Convertible
  • Chrysler 2000 Convertible



  • iTravis
    Mar 26, 11:49 PM
    As long as I can upgrade at the lowest 2 year price (of course ;)) in June/July, a fall release
    wouldn't be that bad.
    I voted negative but now that I think about it, this could be a good thing!
    IF THEY release something truly "magical" in the Fall (use this time wisely if true).

    A larger screen, faster (dual) processor and a new camera (not as dire), will get me by until the Fall.
    New notification system PLEASE!!! :apple:





    Chrysler 2000. 2000 Chrysler Town amp; Country
  • 2000 Chrysler Town amp; Country



  • Multimedia
    Aug 12, 02:32 AM
    Sounds like you'll be getting a nice Penryn MBP then! ;) :D :cool:From the Intel Core Microarchitecture Wiki page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core_Microarchitecture):

    Penryn, dual-core, 45 nm shrink of Merom, 3�6 MiB L2

    So you think Penryn pairs may be the 4 core mobile solution in 2008?





    Chrysler 2000. Chrysler 2000 Models
  • Chrysler 2000 Models



  • iCrizzo
    Mar 27, 10:07 AM
    iOS 5 in the fall is a good thing, at least we know we will be getting some major changes, plus I don't mind waiting for a finished product!





    Chrysler 2000. 2000 Chrysler Cirrus Sedan in
  • 2000 Chrysler Cirrus Sedan in



  • alvindarkness
    Apr 10, 12:22 PM
    I must say i just found this sight through google and had to join because of this post. I am a math teacher and the correct answer is 2

    48/2(9+3) is a different equation than 48/2 * (9+3)

    using Pemdas or the correct order of operations in the first problem
    we first add whats in the parentheses (9+3)= 12
    second step we multiply 2(12) =24
    final step 48/24 = 2

    the people who are getting 288

    are adding (9+3) =12
    then they are skipping an order of operations and going straight to division 48/2 =24
    24 * 12 = 288

    Multiplication doesn't have precedence over division in the order of operations. 1�2�3(1+2)�5*6�7*9 would have the parenthesis done first.. then the rest done left to right. So the next step is 1�2�3*3�5*6�7*9

    Wolfram alpha visualises both of those as the same. i.e.

    http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1�2�3%281%2B2%29�5*6�7*9

    and

    http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1�2�3*3�5*6�7*9

    I agree that the translation of the equation into ascii can cause cause some vagueness, or at least second guessing the intent of the author (was he short handing "all over" with "/" for example). But we have to work with what we have, and I definitely see it as a 288.





    Chrysler 2000. Chrysler PT Cruiser Production
  • Chrysler PT Cruiser Production



  • Manic Mouse
    Sep 11, 08:51 AM
    I really think they should have a seperate app for the movies/tv shows, or rename and overhaul iTunes. Making things too complicated and hard to use is something Apple strives against and by incorperating too much functionality into a MUSIC player will make it hard to use and confusing for customers. iTunes, strangely, should be for "tunes". It makes no sense, at least from the name, to think that there would be movies/tv shows in there.

    Why not take the DVD-player app in OSX and turn that into the new TV show/Movie player (as well as DVDs) while iTunes plays MP3/CDs. That makes much more sense. You should also be able to rip DVD's though this new app as you would CDs in iTunes.





    Chrysler 2000. 1995 - 2000 Chrysler Cirrus
  • 1995 - 2000 Chrysler Cirrus



  • pyramid6
    Sep 11, 01:35 PM
    Why couldn't apple mail a movie to you via USPS? Pop it into your <insert favorite Mac flavor> and have it automaticly import into iTunes library. There is no way I would download a 2g file to watch a movie. 2g is way too big to download. Compare that to music, 5mb on the high end. 2g is 400 times the size. I don't see downloading as a viable option, atleast not at the resolution that makes it competitive with DVD.

    PS I think downloadable movies sounds great, but I don't think it is practicle.





    Chrysler 2000. 2000 Chrysler Neon picture,
  • 2000 Chrysler Neon picture,



  • Chef Medeski
    Aug 11, 10:28 PM
    I'm not interested in purchasing a laptop yet... I was waiting for merom to make its way into a MB.... but also for Leopard so I don't have to pay $100 to upgrade in 4 months.

    But, I also think the real update is with the Santa Rosa chipset... faster FSB... more ram.... 802.11N!!!!

    Thats a big update compared to this.

    I'm watching this though to see how quickly they update their models after a new product is announced, I mean its no longer like PPC days when they would be sitting waiting for the chip to arrive ... late....delayed...and generally just missing.... now they have to keep their computer up to date with the chips.

    A quicker roll-out really would ease my mind, since that hopefully shows that Santa Rosa will be equally swiftly doled out.

    Merom
    802.11n
    Blu-ray
    Leopard
    HD screen
    7 hr battery for bare min. use

    Thats the sweet spot. The last two would be icing on the cake... that would be wonderfully sweet from the blu-ray...

    but hey... I think that will really show that apple is on the forefront of technology ... the EXTREME EDGE...





    Chrysler 2000. 2000 Chrysler Cirrus
  • 2000 Chrysler Cirrus



  • powers74
    May 6, 08:12 AM
    So they can customize/design their own chips. I've been predicting this for years now.





    Chrysler 2000. Chrysler 2000 Lhs. Chrysler
  • Chrysler 2000 Lhs. Chrysler



  • McGiord
    Apr 10, 06:31 PM
    Nope, but considering the level of math it takes to do taxes, he could :D. Should I ask him if he would do yours for you?

    Well thanks for being so generous. But I prefer to pay less taxes, so 2 is still a better calculation than 288.:D

    What kind of ECU you pirate? Vehicle's ECU?





    Chrysler 2000. 2000 Chrysler LHS in Cuyahoga
  • 2000 Chrysler LHS in Cuyahoga



  • Porchland
    Sep 11, 09:18 AM
    Seems to me the new 24" iMac is the "Media Player" - My two largest "monitors" are my 23" ACD and a 26" old skool TV. I watch DVDs on the ACD, as I get a little bit more picture and a lot more clarity than on my TV.
    Seating accommodations in my office aren't as nice as the living room, but oh well...

    It wouldn't be a huge leap for Apple to super-size the 24-inch iMac into 42-inch and 52-inch displays. The architecture of the iMac is well-suited to a plasma display.





    Chrysler 2000. 2000 Chrysler LHS Base Killeen
  • 2000 Chrysler LHS Base Killeen



  • URFloorMatt
    Mar 27, 02:31 PM
    Heh. No LTE, no NFC, no bigger screen, no antenna fix, and now no iOS upgrade? What's the point in releasing an iPhone at all this year?





    Chrysler 2000. 2000 chrysler imperial
  • 2000 chrysler imperial



  • LagunaSol
    Apr 18, 05:11 PM
    LG Prada won a DESIGN award (meaning image was released) for LG Prada in Sep 2006.

    Good, so let LG sue Apple. Just one problem: the iPhone doesn't actually look like the Prada. At all.





    Chrysler 2000. Left Side 2000 Chrysler
  • Left Side 2000 Chrysler



  • Piggie
    Apr 23, 04:52 PM
    What is the point in this?

    For a phone and an iPad which has fixed resolution graphics, yes fine, but on a computer desktop which just scales to whatever resolution you have?

    I don't get it?

    Sure, yes, increase the resolution, but why not increase it to an industry standard instead?

    We have 1920x1080 for many widescreen monitors these days.

    We also have 1920x1200 for a bit more height.

    In the future we will be moving to 4K resolutions for video & computer graphics.

    4K http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4K_resolution


    Then one day we can dream about 8K ;)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8K_Video_Format





    Chrysler 2000. Blue Chrysler LHS 2000 - Texas
  • Blue Chrysler LHS 2000 - Texas



  • RichP
    Nov 22, 11:55 AM
    I have to agree with some previous posters on here; its not going to be the featureset, but the implementation.

    I have a Samsung Smartphone, and WinMobile isnt terrible, but its far from smooth or an enjoyable use. That being said, when you have "real" internet (aka not something that is just for phone use) and "real" Instant Messaging, you begin to actually use these things. The T-Mobile Sidekick, although a bit geared to the younger crowd, its a very good device in terms of its functionality and user interface.

    I basically see the iPhone as a better designed, better user interfaced, and EXTREMELY easy to charge and Sync with a computer. Just like an iPod. All these phones lack in the sync department, Apple could dominate this (which, apart from the user interface, is the thing that sets the ipod apart. Plug it ina and it just works, no fuss)

    Expect to see it sold through Apple unlocked, around 400-450 dollars. People used to pay that for an iPod, they will do so for a phone. Especially when there are VERY expensive ringtones, songs, etc. Apple will be the more economical choice in light of the expensive "services" the providers offer.

    The industry will change. MS will release the "Pune" in 3 years to kill iPhone. In brown.





    Chrysler 2000. old Chrysler LeBaron,
  • old Chrysler LeBaron,



  • Torrijos
    May 6, 02:56 AM
    BS to the power of FUD ^^

    The thing is although ARM chips are pretty good in the low power range right now, nothing says that they will perfectly scale in power for a higher performance range.
    Every major player in the chips industry started seeing more and more problems when they started reaching the manufacturing processes ARM will only reach in a couple of years (currently A15 -> 45nm).

    High performance is where Intel is very good at, and their announcement of 3D transistor in Ivy Bridge already will only make them way better in performance and power consumption, and all that as soon as the end of this year (first machines probably next year).

    Now transition from a software standpoint would be painful, but maybe not horrible...
    Apple's compiler already manages ARM architecture, and part of the interest in LLVM is the possibility of JIT compilation.
    But a switch of architecture right now would need Apple to ask devs to re-compile their software, and maybe a change from some libraries, all that for an uncertain gain right now and improbable gain in the future (Intel will remain the master in high performance computing).





    Chrysler 2000. 2000 Chrysler Concorde 4dr Sdn
  • 2000 Chrysler Concorde 4dr Sdn



  • Peace
    Sep 11, 02:20 PM
    Man..I can't think of anything that hasn't been mentioned here yet..

    I'll add :

    Sony HD Blue Ray Optical Drives for Mac Pros and external drives for other Macs.

    Airport A/V with Blue Ray Drive and Hard Drive..

    and one more thing..

    Whirled Peas:D





    Chrysler 2000. 2000 Chrysler 300M Overview
  • 2000 Chrysler 300M Overview



  • Popeye206
    Apr 26, 03:27 PM
    Makes sense. Android is really becoming the defacto alternative to iOS.

    This is not about iOS vs Android. Both are doing well. It's the others who need to worry like RIM and MS. Where RIM was trying to beat the iPhone 2 years ago, now they have two platforms kicking their butt.

    However, it's really not a fair comparison when you compare the iPhone vs Android. One is a phone and the other an OS. Wake me up when one single model of an Android based phone out sells the iPhone, then you can say Apple is in trouble.





    Chrysler 2000. 2000 Chrysler Neon
  • 2000 Chrysler Neon



  • lucabrasi
    Mar 30, 06:39 PM
    Will this work on the 2011 mbp's?

    The installer does not error out and seems to work... rebooting now





    Chrysler 2000. Chrysler 2000 Pt Cruiser
  • Chrysler 2000 Pt Cruiser



  • mikes63737
    Aug 4, 01:31 PM
    iSight? (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2003/06/20030623160609.shtml)

    I think that the iSight was designed more for communication between business travelers and their families. That's what all their ads showed. :confused:





    toddybody
    Apr 5, 01:56 PM
    Thanks MR for generating discussion around a pretty lame topic. That said, Id rather have Toyota spending their extra time perfecting that little acceleration/braking glitch that affected a "couple" of their cars, than making a lame a$$ Scion theme for Cydia.





    Abstract
    May 2, 10:30 PM
    $1.38 per litre for gas sounds cheaper ... Gas pricing may be the reason the US adopts the metric system

    And people sound less obese when stating their weight in kilograms. ;)

    People buy crack in grams, no? If they can get it, so can others.





    Erwin-Br
    Apr 26, 02:30 PM
    Well Apple doesn't sell its software for use on any other phones (or computers), so how is it competing with software-installed numbers on all hardware types?

    Apple isn't forced to allow iOS only on their own devices.

    Besides, Apple is doing the same thing with OS X, it's made for Macs only, and people have always been comparing their sales against Windows.

    Seems to me you're just bitter about it.





    snberk103
    May 4, 10:33 AM
    So then you can't speak to whether or not it would actually be cost effective for the country to switch.

    ....

    Switching to metric is short-term pain for long-term gain. Older people will need have both measures used for a few years. Some Engineers etc will need to hit the books again (but let's face it - if they can learn the formula's once, they can look up the "translation". It's not like they forget how the principles work).

    The long-term advantages are:
    1) Less freaking-out of kids who are weak in math. "If you have a stick that is 3' 7 13/16" and need to divide it into 3 equal sections, what is the length of the each section to the nearest 1/64 inch?" as opposed to "If you have a stick that 1233 mm long....." - and no, I didn't check to see if they are the same -
    2) Same idea as above.... "If you have a tank filled with 450 cubic yards of water, and it is flowing out at a rate of 3 gallons a minute, how long does it take to empty?" as opposed to the metric system where 1000 litres of water is 1 cubic meter which is 1 tonne (approximately - since altitudes and temperatures affect the density of water).... but it's close enough for horseshoes....
    3) Manufacturing. As the last industrialized country in the world still non-metric, do people really believe that there isn't a cost when a US factory has to retool to provide a product for export? Or understand that the cost of goods being imported from off-shore includes the cost of retooling for an non-metric customer? Do people not think that some small factories in the US have lost contracts to off-shore customers because they couldn't afford to switch to a metric size? And that some US factories have probably been forced to retool anyway when the sole supplier of a component wouldn't make a special run of non-metric fasteners?

    Just asking. The days when the USA was top of the heap in manufacturing are past. The USA is now competing head to head with the rest of the world that has left behind bolts that are 3/16 diameter and 1 7/8 long and 12tpi.





    kiljoy616
    Apr 20, 12:47 AM
    to really stay ahead of the market Apple will need to:

    add a 4" screen
    keep the same form factor
    add the dual core A5 processor
    update the GPU to something similar in the iPad 2
    while keeping the same or improving the battery life
    add a 64GB version
    (possible 8 MP backlit CMOS sensor camera along side possible 1080p recording since the iPad can now output in full 1080p through HDMI)

    Since it sounds like Apple is going to make us wait till September anything less than this rather reasonable list would be a major letdown while allowing the competition more time to get caught up.

    Please site sources of when has Apple cared about staying ahead of an artificial market. I am trying to think of a time and they never really cared. They bring out what works when it works and that is why they do so well without having to have 100 products out all the time.

    Nope Apple will take its time and do it right, as for a better camera really how big do you want to take your picture, I want sharper image and video not more gimmicky camera that don't hold their water. Faster response time on the UI would be welcome. The Snow Leopard of the phone business.

    And for those that want 4G not sure if I care or want to see my battery go dead fast. I must admit 3G just does not seem slow to me and its more about location location location.
    This article does not make me all warm inside about 4G for now.
    http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-19736_7-20046412-251.html