1969 Ford Mustang

1969 Ford Mustang. ford mustang boss 429 picture
  • ford mustang boss 429 picture



  • waloshin
    Apr 11, 03:25 AM
    The answer is 288.

    Anyone with a decent education is taught B.E.D.M.A.S not PEDMAS.

    Brackets.Exponents. Division.Addition/Subtraction in that order!

    /End thread.





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 Rear
  • 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 Rear



  • Reach9
    Mar 28, 12:19 PM
    The iPhone 4 got massive external and internal changes while the 3Gs just got internal changes. iPhone 4 is a bigger refresh than the 3Gs. I never said the 3Gs was not a real refresh I said it was not as big as the iPhone 4.

    Understood.

    Anyway, i think Apple is just shooting themselves in the leg if they plan to release the iPhone 5 later. I'm gonna give it a day or two for reports from other sources.
    Everything so far has pointed to a Summer release, so it makes no sense for it to just change all of a sudden.





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 ford mustang
  • 1969 ford mustang



  • Dustman
    Apr 24, 08:04 PM
    It seems highly likely to me that Apple will start rolling in retina everywhere in the near future. It would make sense for them to use ultra high resolution screens in its products to one up PC manufacturers and further differentiate themselves from PCs. It would also add to the 'Premium' experience that Apple likes to sell people on.





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang Pictures
  • 1969 Ford Mustang Pictures



  • Clive At Five
    Nov 22, 02:44 PM
    You break my heart. Something tells me that this won't be the phone for me. I would put money on it having the one thing I don't want - a camera. I don't want it, I don't need it, and it's a pain to have one.

    Although, I was thinking that there would be just a couple of BTO options - maybe a camera and BT - not an entire gamut of BTO possabilities. I agree that too many would be expensive (and the firmware would end up too complicated).

    I think I would sold on a camera if and only if it takes >3MP shots & syncs w/ iPhoto... and the phone costs less than $300. :-P

    -Clive





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang
  • 1969 Ford Mustang



  • notabadname
    Apr 26, 02:23 PM
    As relevant as saying Apple sells more phones than Android does . . . oh wait, Android isn't a phone seller/manufacturer.

    Well Apple doesn't sell its software for use on any other phones (or computers), so how is it competing with software-installed numbers on all hardware types? If people were shifting from Samsung or Motorola phones with Apple iOS to Samsung or Motorola phones with Android, than Apple would be losing in the software market.

    This has always be a case of apples to broccoli (yeah, it's not even a fruit versus fruit comparison).





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang - Pictures
  • 1969 Ford Mustang - Pictures



  • ckeck
    Aug 3, 11:56 AM
    Why doesn't Apple just release a new battery?? ;)





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 ford mustang
  • 1969 ford mustang



  • prady16
    Sep 15, 08:35 PM
    Just seeing soooooo many people 'painfully' waiting for the Merom MBP, i think we should start a Merom MBP club as soon as we start receiving them!

    Btw, how many days does it take for the new MBPs to arrive in the Apple showrooms from the time they are announced?





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang Mach One 1
  • 1969 Ford Mustang Mach One 1



  • leman
    May 6, 01:58 AM
    If ARM is indeed able to make high-performance CPUs, then a move like this would be one of the most significant ones in the computing history. Let's face it: the x86 architecture is a dead end. Its needlessly complicated and builds on obsolete tech. Internally, the modern x86 CPUs aren't even x86 anymore - they decompose, recompile and reorder the machine code as they execute it. The ARM assembly is more suited for modern computing as it is more efficient as the x86 code and allows better CPU pipeline utilization.

    The real question is whether ARM is able to create a CPU which is powerful enough to compete with Intel's offerings. The x86 may be inefficient but the sophisticated design of Intel CPUs results in great performance. ARM must really step on it to attain these levels.

    P.S. If something like this should happen, I am sure that ARM will include hardware emulation layer for x86 instructions, for compatibility with older software. Any anyway, what does it cost to recompile an application? Indeed: nothing (if the application is competently written, that is).





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang Boostang
  • 1969 Ford Mustang Boostang



  • MacNut
    Apr 9, 09:36 PM
    So if the parentheses are solved first why not just put them in front? Why go through all the semantics? Do scientists purposely make it this hard when solving equations?





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 428
  • 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 428



  • macsamillion
    Apr 25, 09:53 AM
    OK. Call me naive; but it seems the privacy war was lost a long time ago... there is apparently much money to be made by reenacting the battle;

    consider the logistics of tracking, storing, and sorting through, what is it 120 million, consolidated.db files. Why. Yes, we are talking about small computer files that may just take minutes to sort through, but who cares what I do? I can assure you that in the grand scheme of things my life is meaningless and so are my consolidated.db files...





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang Fastback
  • 1969 Ford Mustang Fastback



  • Consultant
    Mar 29, 08:57 AM
    And Amazon thinks crippling ioS compatibility will be good business? FAIL.





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang Boss 302
  • 1969 Ford Mustang Boss 302



  • inkswamp
    May 4, 02:47 PM
    Fine. Seems like a logical move, but if Apple wants me to foot part of the bill for distributing their software (via my paid Internet connection) then I certainly expect a significant cut in the cost of the upgrade.





    1969 Ford Mustang. +1969_ford_mustang+mach_1.
  • +1969_ford_mustang+mach_1.



  • iVeBeenDrinkin'
    Apr 9, 08:55 PM
    (48/2)(9+3) would be straight forward. The way the formula was originally typed lends interpretation as:

    48/
    2(9+3)

    Why would someone choose to group one set with parentheses and not another unless they were being intentionally ambiguous?

    Did you call your elementary school teacher? I didn't. They taught me well enough the first time.

    iVeBeenDrinkin' likes this.





    1969 Ford Mustang. Silver 1969 Ford Mustang Mach
  • Silver 1969 Ford Mustang Mach



  • munkery
    Dec 25, 01:21 PM
    If mac users don't use av software, there's little motivation for anyone to supply it. If NO ONE is working on av software, then in the eventuality that we do need it, we're all starting from scratch. That's just never a good place to be if you can with minimal effort prevent it.

    It's kind of like getting your flu shot in a year when the flu isn't supposed to be particularly bad. I seldom get the flu, but I go ahead and get the shot every year anyway because if no one does, there's little motivation for pharma companies to develop future flu shots. Which means in the really bad flu years, there's a shortage because only one company is making the shot.

    Flu vaccines are very much like AV software for Mac. They both rely on fear, uncertainty, and doubt. H1N1 killed fewer people per year than the more typical strain of flu but the marketing hype made big business a lot of money.





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang Boss 302
  • 1969 Ford Mustang Boss 302



  • Hattig
    Aug 7, 06:31 PM
    Does anyone know if this systems absolutely *REQUIRES* ECC RAM?

    ECC is very expensive!

    Wait until you see the FBDIMM pricing ...





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 TV
  • 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 TV



  • Eldiablojoe
    May 4, 01:38 PM
    I would suggest that we always move forward. I think going backwards is only something worth considering IF am adventurer sustains significant injury and we had JUST left a room w an unused healing potion / talisman / chingas. Why give mscriv the opportunity to seed traps behind us?





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1
  • 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1



  • wildmac
    Aug 7, 04:07 PM
    I'm excited but disappointed at the same time.
    the base video card is pretty meh.

    The need a low-end option for those that aren't doing PS, Doom, or 3-D rendering...





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang Sportsroof
  • 1969 Ford Mustang Sportsroof



  • Tones2
    Mar 28, 11:07 AM
    Come on - there will be an iPhone 5 in July. That's the customer expectation and if they did NOT release it then, their stock price would suffer and they would certainly lose market share to the newer phones. They are already somewhat behind newer phones that have much larger screens, faster processors, better cameras, etc - no way they wait until next year or even winter 2011. They will find component supplies and keep on track.

    Tony





    1969 Ford Mustang. 1969 Ford Mustang SportsRoof
  • 1969 Ford Mustang SportsRoof



  • ticman
    Nov 20, 09:25 AM
    I called two Apple stores in my state (Connecticut) and both are out. Available from their website with free shipping but a 2 to 3 week delay in shipping.





    suwandy
    Sep 15, 06:13 PM
    So, how is MacShrine perceived in the rumor community? Do they have a sufficiently good track record for us to say, "this is it - the Merom MBP is finally coming", or is this likely to be just another rehash of all the Core2Duo MBP hype/frustration going around?

    Reliable or not, I guess this is a good news for many of us waiting for the C2D MBP. If it proved reliable, I think MacRumors should pay more attention to check their updates in the future. ;)

    I was about to think of that as "another crappy site?" but then I thought, hey, everyone have their own sources that you could never imagine, like one of the posts right before Sept 12th event claiming to know the entire agenda, and he's pretty accurate, no?





    dashiel
    Apr 7, 11:53 AM
    I see people still don�t understand what a monopoly is. Apple would only be considered a monopoly if they used their power & influence to force the component supplier to cancel or move Apple�s orders ahead of RIM�s or any other.

    Personally I bet RIM is breathing a huge sigh of relief, by all accounts the PlayBook is as unfinished and rough around the edges as Honeycomb on the Xoom.





    snberk103
    May 5, 03:30 PM
    .... Most other countries enacted policy through a quiet parliamentary action that was later carried out by agencies or at a time when most people weren't active in politics. ...

    In the US there are a lot of veto points in the legislative process, making any significant change hard to do. ... why should they care about a measurement system when the one they are using right now is working for them?
    ...
    Any realistic transition for the US would take decades.

    This, I believe, captures the situation really well. Inertia, coupled with a fairly de-centralized government (at least as far as this issue is concerned). And a population that is fairly resistant to change, in many areas.

    Another example is the move to a $1 coin. How many times and for how long has the US been trying to introduce this coin? Every study done shows it will save taxpayers money. Still no-go. In Canada we had no choice. The $1 coin was introduced, then the banks were told to hand out only the coins, and to start sending back to Ottawa any $1 bills that their customers were depositing. Within a few years we were a $1 bill free country. Then they removed the $2 bills. These bills are still legal, there just isn't any of them circulating. And if a bank gets one, they don't put it back into circulation. Done.





    jibjab kalonji
    Aug 12, 02:43 AM
    the name merom is fantastic. it automatically makes this processor cool. no not cool temperature-wise but cool as in, "that jerk over there is kind of cool."





    Piggie
    Apr 23, 04:56 PM
    Agreed re: future-proofing, but are you seriously suggesting that Apple isn't serious about GPUs? They've probably got a higher "minimum acceptable" standard for GPU performance than any other manufacturer. The one thing they don't do is chase the bleeding edge super-high-end gaming GPUs.

    Also: games don't HAVE to render at native display resolutions. And as resolution gets higher, the artifacts from not being at the native level become much less visible.

    Apple's problem is that they put "Looks" before performance.

    They crippled their chances of ever becoming a serious competitor to the PC for games due to deciding to use giant laptops on a stand which meant they could not cool any decent graphics cards, handing the gaming crown to the PC for years on a plate.

    As for the future who knows.